• Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
E-mail Print PDF

September 3, 2010

Saudi Judicial System and Social Reform
Commentary by Dr. Ali Alyami

 

“War on Terrorism” to Crush Pro Democracy Advocates

Director’s Comment: Since the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks and their unprecedented, far-reaching repercussions domestically and globally, the Saudi government has embarked on a hunting program ostensibly to catch and incarcerate alleged terrorists and terrorists to be. For this effort, the Saudi government has been showered with sycophantically praises, specifically from its Western friends and supporters. Famous for its arbitrary arrests and imprisonment of people without charges and/or trials for months and years, many Saudi citizens and human rights groups have been raising questions about the extensive waves of arrests, and whether the Saudi government is actually using “War on Terrorism” to destroy pro-democracy Saudi citizens. "Using the anti-terror campaign has been the conspicuous Saudi policy to arrest and harass political reformists and human-rights activists," says Mohammed al-Qahtani, co-founder of the Saudi Civil and Political Rights Association, which has become the most public face of a maturing national civil-rights movement.

As the attached account indicates, the state’s methods of arbitrary arrests and incarceration remain unaltered. The highly contested case of prominent pro political reformist “Suliman al-Reshoudi, a 73-year-old former judge turned activist” seems to attest to the fact that the Saudi judicial system has not changed despite King Abdullah’s royal decrees to modernize the religiously controlled institution. The Saudi autocratic monarchs consider political activists more dangerous to their control than religious extremists. This is evidenced by the fact that many extremist clerics are on the government’s payroll.

It might be prudent for the US government, companies and other institutions to reconsider their cooperation with the Saudi government when dealing with war on terrorism or siding with the Saudi government against its people. The Saudi people are very astute; they could tell if the West is contributing to their oppression by collaborating with their repressive regime and its institutions, such as the Saudi Ministry of Interior.
Read Article


Shopping for a Spine Butcher

Director’s Comment: A presiding Saudi judge is shopping around for a hospital, willing to cut a sentenced man’s spine in half in accordance with Islam’s Shariah law, practiced in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia is the birth place of Islam and home to the religion’s holy shrines, that 1.5 billion Muslims face and pray towards five times a day. The Judge (Saoud bin Suleiman Al-Youssef), from Tabuk has been searching for a hospital that would agree to destroy the spine of Abdul-Aziz Al-Mutairi, aged 22, who was convicted of damaging another man’s spine in a fight two years ago. According to the attached article, the brother of the injured man said that his family “…would be ready to send the attacker abroad to perform the operation if it were not possible in the Kingdom”.

Human rights groups and even Saudi newspapers have documented accounts of Saudi courts, which have ordered for individuals to have their teeth smashed, their eyes pocked, limbs and heads chopped off, in the designated “chop chop” public squares. The latter is a common ritual after Friday prayers in Saudi Arabia.

It would only take a Royal Decree, not only to put an end to arbitrary Saudi court abuses, but to reform Islam to make it compatible with globalization, democracy and modern living. A great deal of resentment by non-Muslims and Muslims is directed toward the way Saudis practice and use Islam as a tool of oppression, discrimination, incitement and intolerance of other beliefs and their adherents.

The question is: why should Muslims be surprised, incensed or feel the world does not understand Islam, if the practices of stoning women to death or beheading Muslims who open up to other beliefs, persists?

What should the US Government do about cases like this and others, such as the gang-raped 19 year old Saudi woman Bint Al-Qatief, who was sentenced to flogging for being seen sitting in a car with a man not related to her? Nothing, said former national security advisor Fran Townsend, during an interview on CNN. Ms. Townsend is now a partner at former Secretary of State James Baker’s law firm, with an office in Saudi Arabia.
Read Article


Hammering Nails into Her Bones

Director’s Comment: Due to total absence of codified and institutionalized rule of non-sectarian laws applicable uniformly to all citizens and residents of Saudi Arabia, horrendous crimes against dependents (children and wives) and defenseless expatriates, especially housemaids (modern slaves) occur frequently. The cruel punishment of this unprotected Sri Lankan maid is not isolated or least severe according to personal accounts made available to CDHR and other groups.

The fate of the estimated ten million migrant workers (mostly Asians), in particular house servants, is determined by their employers whose rights are determined by the government’s pre- modern judicial system. This is the same judicial system that hands down harsher punishments to gang-rape victims (see Bint Al-Qatief) than to their rapists. Defenseless maids, family drivers and other expatriate laborers in Saudi Arabia rarely report the heinous crimes in fear of losing their jobs and/or of deportation, and when they do their employers (masters, owners) are hardly punished for their crimes, especially if the victims are non-Muslims. The pre-ordered expatriate laborers are treated as hostages, their passports are confiscated by their employers upon their arrival to Saudi Arabia and they cannot move, mingle with others, or communicate with their families without their employers’ permission. They are not paid regularly and some of the maids are on duty 24/7.

Not only are the unlucky expatriates mistreated by many of their employers and even more so by the arbitrary Saudi sectarian judicial system, but they are also ignored by their own governments. This is due to the Saudi government and its businessmen’s heavy-handed financial influence on those governments and their businesses. The expatriates are not only forgotten and ignored by their governments, but also by the UN, the World Trade Organization (WTO), migrant workers’ agencies, labor unions, Saudi Western democratic allies and all Arab and Muslim institutions in the West.

When it comes to the Saudi government’s domestic and foreign policies, as well as their practices and thereof repercussions on the Saudi people and expatriates, everyone looks the other way.

The Center for Democracy and Human Rights in Saudi Arabia (CDHR), calls on the migrant workers’ agencies, international labour unions, the World Trade Organization, human rights groups as well as decent peoples and governments, to stand up and expose the rampant abuses of migrant workers in Saudi Arabia.
Read Article


Unabated War Against Saudi Women

Director’s Comment: In their undiminished insistence that the country’s wealth, decision-making and governorship remain property of the ruling family and its theocratic partners, any meaningful reform in Saudi Arabia will remain aesthetic. The recurrent tactic has been to pre-design royal decrees that sound liberal to the public, but are sure to be rejected by the religious establishment and its royal handlers, such as Princes Naif and Salman. The king consequently benefits of a favorable public opinion, despite the fact his highly praised reform efforts remain “ink on paper”, especially when it comes to women’s rights.

Case in point is a recent decision taken by the Panda supermarket chain, to hire 16 women cashiers in a store in Saudi Arabia’s most liberal city, Jeddah. Members of the religious establishment immediately protested against the company’s decision. They called it “ungodly” and urged people to stop patronizing the supermarket. Despite the fact that the women were covered from head to toe (except for their eyes) and are only allowed to serve families, the store was empty of customers, and cashiers were sitting idol as of last reporting on August 31, 2010. Not surprisingly, there was no word from King Abdullah to support the supermarket’s decision to hire women cashiers or to instruct his religious zealot to quit harassing people.

These duplicitous political maneuvers employed by royals, usually result in an unfair blame of society for rejecting women. Religion is also blamed for denying women their basic citizenship rights. In reality, neither society and/or religion are responsible for denying women their natural and human rights to feed themselves and support their families. It is politics and the Saudi economy that are responsible for denying women their right to work. Allowing women to work would challenge the country’s economy as well as its sterile, patriarchal ideology. These same policies exonerate the system from meeting its obligations toward all members of society.

The attached article explains the regime’s methods of playing genders against each other by blaming it on society, tradition and God.
Read Article


"Shift in Arab Views of Iran?"

Director’s Comment: Anyone who is not aware of the realities in the Arab World, would think that Arab public opinion actually matters. It doesn’t. Arab public opinion, especially in Saudi Arabia, is shaped by institutionalized fear, intimidation, and swift reprisal if individuals deviate from what they have been fed by their mosques, schools and governments’ controlled media. In general, the only three things Arabs are relatively safe to express or fight over freely are: Praising their rulers, defending Islam and blaming the US and Israel for their staggering and homegrown political, social and economic ills.

The pollsters who collected the data specified below never asked Saudis or Egyptians how they feel about their ruling autocratic, theocratic dynasties and their oppressive policies. They never asked how Saudis’ and Egyptians’ perceptions of themselves, the West and the wider international community were formed. One can only hope, that decision-makers who read these polls, are both aware of the realities in the Arab world and the agendas of the pollsters themselves. The pollsters operate under the Saudi and Egyptian rules and close supervision.
Read Article


“US to sell Saudi Arabia arms worth $60bn in biggest deal”

Director’s Comment: Despite spending tens of billions of dollars on military hardware and detective technologies during the course of the last fifty years, the Saudis have never fought a war, big or small, on their own in the past; nor will they dare do so in the future. To sustain a major regional war, i.e with Iran, would require citizenry support and participation. Citizens of Saudi Arabia would not, nor should they be expected, to lay their lives on the line for a regime they consider corrupt, archaic, and repressive. Consequently, the hereditary rulers will continue to rely on external entities to protect them from external aggression, domestic uprisings and from each other. In addition, the regime knows that engaging in real wars would expedite their downfall.

The pending $ 60 billion arms sale to the unstable Saudi monarchy, may help the US economy in the short run, but could boomerang for three major reasons. First, given the Saudi people’s sprouting, enigmatically ignored needs and skyrocketing expectations (in particular that of the youth, women and minorities), the Saudi regime’s stability is likely to erode regardless of how many arms and external protection the autocratic monarchs purchase. Long-term stability must be built within, on service to the population, rather than through a military muscle show. Secondly, the hi-tech hardware purchased could end up in the hands of the wrong people, including members of the ruling family who share extremist and terrorist groups’ objectives. Thirdly, the question to ask is, do we need the Saudi regime to get more leverage over our domestic and foreign policies, by investing even more in an already bloated defense industry?

The Saudi people have been warned about potential threats from Iran. They remain skeptical. For the past seventy years, they have been lied to and told that Israel is their mortal enemy, obstructing the transformation of their vast desert kingdom, from inhospitable sand dunes into a garden of Eden. To the monarchs’ and their beneficiaries’ discomfort, the Saudi people are slowly discovering that these narratives were just a fictitious ploy by their ruling autocratic and theocratic elites to deflect their attention from their homegrown social, political, economic, educational and religious ills. It would be revealing to find out how and where the majority of the Saudi people like to see their money spent. Would they want the oil bounty to be spent on arms purchase to protect the ruling family, or on repairing and modernizing their dilapidated infrastructure?

Based on what I know, they would happily choose the latter. Major Saudi cities don’t have sewage systems, reliable drinking water or electricity systems. In addition, city streets, businesses and residential areas are not even numbered. Modern streets, hospitals, sewage systems, and the like would do more for the poorly served Saudi citizen, than inordinately expensive fighter jets flying over their heads and deafening their ears.

Our government and other institutions should rethink focusing on short-term gains and invest in human development, prodemocracy movements, empowerment of Saudi women, promotion of religious tolerance, free press and modern institutions. The Saudi people, their perceptions, expectations, and demands are taking off in a full speed. The effectiveness of the sword and influence of prayer callers and fatwa issuers are slowly diminishing; yet the regime and its domestic and external beneficiaries continue to ignore the writing on the walls.
Read Article


Governors, Beware of Saggy pants and logos

Director’s Comment: During his annual meeting with regional governors (all members of the ruling family), second Deputy and Interior Minster, Prince Naif, alerted the governors to pay special attention to the case of Saudi youth that wear their pants in a non-conformist style. As the man in charge of domestic security, he feels that some young Saudis have stepped out of the government’s dictated social conformity rules, by deviating from government’s enforced dress code.

The danger of permitting such behaviour might cause the youth population to become less obedient and enable them to start thinking out of the box. He warned parents to make sure their offspring behaved properly and encouraged the governors to find ways to keep the youth occupied. Naif among other recommendations, Naif instructed the governors to create regimentally controlled government clubs, which translate to close management of youth behavior and movements.

Incongruously, the saggy pants and logo wearers are the ones who defy and undermine the power and dictate of the religious extremists and their rejectionist ideology. Could it be that the ruling family feels safer with religious extremists than with a new a generation of globally minded young Saudis who are open to new ideas, lifestyles and acceptance of other peoples’ values and contributions? Ask educate and prodemocracy native Saudis and the answer will be unequivocally yes. Something to think about and re-evaluate.
Read Article


Caveat to Muslims in the West?

Director’s Comment: A resounding majority of the British population (75%) believes that “Islam is negative for Britain.” This sentiment is not confined to the British. We are witnessing unprecedented movements across Europe, against the infringement of Muslim culture, religion and dress code on European societies. Europeans and outspoken Americans are taking actions to ban Muslim cultural encroachment on their lives and on their democratic values. Blinded by their small victories and perceived religious supremacy, Muslims in their homelands and in other parts of the world, do not seem to take notice of other peoples’ impatience with their unsolicited way of life.

Historically, when a society feels threatened by external enemies or by a segment of its population, it can be mobilized to do horrendous damage, to that segment and to itself in the process. Recent history is replete with vivid examples. Muslims in the West are seen as a threat to Western culture, way of life and economic stability. In a scientifically based survey taken by the Islamic Education and Research Academy (iERA) -a Muslim polling entity- found that their religion and its adherents are immensely resented in the United Kingdom. The poll revealed that a staggering 94% of British citizens see Islam as a repressive religion, especially for women. The surveyors, like most Muslims, attributed this negative view of Islam and Muslims, to non-Muslims’ misunderstanding of their religion. iERA's senior researcher Hamza Tzortzis said, "We wanted to do something positive with the survey results rather than just say, 'It's so sad'. So, the organisation's strategy is to give a new realm of possibility for people to comprehend Islam, have a proper respect for Islam and see the human relevance of the faith."

The question is: what do Muslims want non-Muslims in Britain, America and the rest of the world, to know about Islam that could change their negative views of Islam? Based on what non-Muslims see on the news, experience and hear in the streets, in mosques, in Muslim schools in Britain -let alone in Iraq, Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, Afghanistan, Iran, and Saudi Arabia- the overwhelming majority of the British (77%) do not want to be associated with Islam. Unlike most Muslims, the majority of Westerners relate to each other through social interaction, merits, common values, tangible contributions and tolerance of differences. Most Muslims, relate to others through religious orientation.

For non-Muslims, religions are private theologies, whereas for Muslims, religion is more than a private belief system; Islam is a way of life that governs every aspect of Muslims’ lives, including their behavior, relationships and perceptions of themselves and the world. The Saudi government for instance, the world’s most influential exporter of repressive Muslim ideology, uses Islam’s religious tenets as the country’s constitution and law. Simultaneously, Saudi Arabia has been rated one of the most authoritarian regimes in the world. Is it any wonder the West wants to prevent Islam from taking root in their democracies?
Read Article


Join us:

The Center for Democracy & Human Rights in Saudi Arabia (CDHR) is a non-profit 501(c) (3) organization based in Washington, DC. CDHR provides new and accurate information for the benefit of the public, the business community and policy makers about the current situation in Saudi Arabia. CDHR’s goal is to help bring about a peaceful democratic transition from a single-family autocratic rule to a participatory political system where the rights of all Saudi citizens are protected under the rule of civil laws.

The Center could not undertake this important task without the active support of visionary individuals and foundations. CDHR needs the support of people who understand the importance of building a united, prosperous and tolerant society in Saudi Arabia where people are empowered to determine their destiny and the fate of their important, but unstable country. Please visit our website (www.cdhr.info) to learn about our work and see what you might do to support the many Saudi men and women who risk their livelihood and lives to promote a just political system that rejects all forms of incitement, religious hatred and oppression at home and abroad.

Your financial investment in democracy building in Saudi Arabia will benefit the Saudi people, the Middle East, the Muslim world, and the international community. Your contribution will make a difference and is greatly appreciated.

Please do not hesitate to contact us with any questions you may have about our mission and what you can do to promote a non-sectarian, accountable and transparent political system in Saudi Arabia where all citizens are treated equally under the rule of civil laws.

Contact us:

Center for Democracy & Human Rights in Saudi Arabia
1050 17th Street NW, Suite 1000
Washington, DC 20036

Phone: (202) 558-5552, (202) 413-0084

Fax: (202) 536-5210

Email: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

 
E-mail Print PDF

Caveat to Muslims in the West?

Director’s Comment: A resounding majority of the British population (75%) believe that “Islam is negative for Britain.” This sentiment is not confined to the British. We are witnessing unprecedented movements all over Europe against the infringement of Muslim culture, religion and dress code on European societies. Europeans and outspoken Americans are taking actions to ban Muslim cultural encroachment into their lives and on their democratic values. Blinded by their small victories and perceived religious supremacy, Muslims, in their homelands and in other parts of the world, do not seem to take notice of other peoples’ impatience with their unwelcome way of life.

Historically, when a society feels threatened by external enemies or by a segment of its population, it can be mobilized to do horrendous damage to others and to itself in the process. Recent history is replete with vivid examples. Muslims in the West are seen as a threat to Western culture, way of life and economic stability. In a scientifically based survey taken by the Islamic Education and Research Academy (iERA), a Muslim polling entity, found that their religion and its adherents are immensely resented in the United Kingdom. The poll revealed that a staggering 94% of British citizens see Islam as a repressive religion, especially for women. The surveyors, like most Muslims, attributed this negative view of Islam and Muslims to non-Muslims’ misunderstanding of their religion. iERA's senior researcher Hamza Tzortzis said, "We wanted to do something positive with the survey results rather than just say, 'It's so sad'. So, the organisation's strategy is to give a new realm of possibility for people to comprehend Islam, have a proper respect for Islam and see the human relevance of the faith."

The question is what do Muslims want non-Muslims in Britain, America and the world to know about Islam that could change their negative views of Islam. Based on what non-Muslims see on the news, experience, and hear in the streets, mosques and Muslim schools in Britain, let alone in Iraq, Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, Afghanistan, Iran, and Saudi Arabia among other places, the overwhelming majority of the British (77%) do not want to have anything to do with Islam. Unlike most Muslims, the majority of Westerners relate to each other and to other people through social interaction, merits, common values, tangible contributions and tolerance of differences. Most Muslims, on the other hand, relate to others through religious orientation.

For non-Muslims, religions are private theologies; for Muslims, religion is more than a private belief system; Islam is a way of life that governs every aspect of Muslims’ lives, including their behavior, relationships and perceptions of themselves and the world. For example, the Saudi government, the world’s most influential exporter of repressive Muslim ideology, uses Islam’s religious tenets as the country’s constitution and law. At the same time, Saudi Arabia is considered one of the most authoritarian regimes in the world. Is it any wonder the West wants to prevent Islam from taking root in their democracies?
Read Article


 
E-mail Print PDF

Saudi News & Analysis

 

Commentary by Dr. Ali Alyami

August 3, 2010

Muslims are at War with Themselves and in Conflict with the West

Director’s Comment: There is an escalating conflict within and between Muslims societies over different interpretations of Islam and religious rituals. Muslim on Muslim killings, the destruction of minorities’ holy shrines and other cultural heritages, as well as the ongoing carnage in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Yemen, and Iran are but some examples of bloody conflict among Muslims. The rampant oppression (in one fashion or another) of Muslim and non-Muslim minorities in all Arab and Muslim countries bears witness to a religion mired in contradictions and at odds with itself and, by extension, with the rest of the world, especially the West.

In reaction to the recent destruction of one of Sufi Islam’s oldest and most revered shrines in Pakistan, a Muslim writer in Saudi Arabia wrote, “For whatever reason, the cancer of extremism is fast eating into the vitals of the entire Muslim world. A lunatic fringe has hijacked their faith and claims to speak on their behalf and all Muslims can do is wring their hands in helplessness. In their long and eventful history, Muslims have never faced a greater challenge to their identity and existence. This sickness within is far more dangerous than what they confront from without.

Where are Muslim voices of reason and sanity? Where are our leaders, our Ulema and intellectuals when we need them so badly? Why don't they come out in the open to speak out against this distortion of our faith and morbid celebration of death? If their voices aren't heard, they must shout from the rooftops but speak they must. There's no other way to stop this madness. This is no time to hide.”
Read Article


Is Muslim Disunity the Enemy?

Director’s Comment: In a statement read on his behalf at the Muslim World League conference on July 31, 2010, King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia was quoted saying that disunity is Muslims’ greatest enemy. Two questions come to mind: Have Muslims ever been united, and if miraculously they can be, what would their unity accomplish for their mostly disenfranchised, impoverished, scientifically and technologically backward peoples? The answer is that nothing would come from Muslim unity except strengthening the hand of theocrats and their institutions that deny most Muslims their basic human rights. Most Muslim countries have done very little to advance their lagging societies individually, so things could only get worse with united theocracies.

The Saudi government and its domestic, regional and international Islamic charities and agents have been working on all fronts to unite and mobilize the faithful against non-Muslims, especially the West. It has been ubiquitously documented that the Saudi government has been paying for most Muslim institutions and groups throughout the world for decades and this financing has intensified since the 9/11 attack on the U.S. by mostly Saudi nationals.

The Saudi government has been investing handsomely in the economies of the 57 member states and entities of the Organization of Islamic Congress, including $400 billion in the Turkish economy over the coming four years. In short, the Saudi government is using its petrodollar revenues not to modernize its society, but instead to promote its austere brand of Islam, Wahhabism. The Saudi ruling family uses a variety of channels and methods, especially the Muslim World League among others, to spread Wahhabism throughout the world, including in the U.S. The Saudi government’s objective is to establish extremist and loyal Muslim communities throughout the world on which it could rely to promote the Saudi ruling elites’ interests. They have succeeded in achieving this goal in many Muslim and non-Muslim countries. The only beneficiaries of united Muslims would be the Saudi autocrats and theocrats.
Read Article


Youth Restlessness and Identity Crises: Ticking Bomb

Director’s Comment: The enormous failure of the Saudi government and its pre-modern methods of coping with changing times is steadily undermining the country’s stability and endangering its social and political cohesiveness. The Saudi government’s unwillingness to recognize and focus on its internal problems and construct modern solutions for modern problems pose unprecedented threats to the system and society. Prominent among the major problem is the burgeoning youth (men and women) who are reported to be more than 60% of the population. Growing up in the rapid and complex age of computers, cell phones, satellite channels, pornography, Facebook, Twitter and blogs where they can chat with each other and the rest of the world, Saudi youth identify more with their counterparts in San Francisco, Casablanca, Brussels and Madrid than they do with their parents, religious teachings and Saudi cultural values.

Enigmatically, the Saudi ruling elites do not seem to take notice of the writing on the wall. They insist on obsolete solutions for all needs and occasions: Memorize the Quran, pray five times a day, obey the king and blame the West and Israel for homegrown and nurtured problems. Young Saudi men and women have been showing signs of discontent and restlessness for years. Some of them went on a destructive rampage in Alkhobar city in eastern Saudi Arabia and in Mecca in 2009. Most of them are unemployed and resent their socially, religiously and politically oppressive institutions, gender segregation, total lack of entertainment and grim prospects for the future. Delaying positive and modern responses to Saudi youth’s needs and aspirations is a guaranteed recipe for instability, crimes and increased participation in extremist and terrorist groups’ activities, but who is listening or noticing?
Read Article


Why Do They Flee?

Director’s Comment: The saga of expatriate housemaids and family drivers (“modern slaves”) in Saudi Arabia and other oil rich Arab Gulf Sheikdoms continues unabated. It is estimated that there are about fifteen to twenty million expatriate cheap laborers in the autocratically ruled Arab Sheikdoms, Kingdoms and Sultanates in the Arabian Peninsula. The majority of these unlucky laborers (eight to ten million) work in Saudi Arabia and are considered to be among the most abused migrant workers in the world according to human rights groups and activists. It is also estimated that between one to two million of these abused and neglected men and women (mostly from Asian countries) are housemaids and family drivers in Saudi homes. They serve around the clock for meager salaries and can be physically punished and sexually abused by any family member of the house in which they toil. Their passports are confiscated by their sponsors (masters) the day that they arrive in Saudi Arabia, making the workers hostages of their employers. The only way for them to change employers, travel or spend time with their compatriots is to run away. They have no recourse to air their grievances, especially those workers who are non-Muslims. The embassies of the countries from which they hail rarely help them because most of those countries are recipients of Saudi government largess, including subsidized oil supplies. The workers cannot organize labor unions because all forms of civil society in Saudi Arabia are forbidden, even for native Saudi citizens.
Read Article


Saudi Women Excel and Lead Competently

Director’s Comment: Under severe political, religious, economic and cultural conditions and man-made hurdles that subsist only in Saudi Arabia in the 21st century, many Saudi women are courageously pushing boundaries. There is no other country on earth where institutionalized and scrupulously enforced policies exist to deny women their full citizenship and human rights. Women are prevented from developing their natural talents and applying them to support themselves and contribute to the building of their country, and the price for such unnatural practices is very high. For example, Saudi public and private sectors employ between eight and ten million imported workers while more than 80% of educated and able Saudi women are denied the right to work. Saudi women are forced into depending on male relatives for all their needs, including applying for a job and obtaining life-saving medication. This denigrating practice is known as the male guardianship system and it is enforced by all government agencies. Despite these destructive policies and restrictions, many Saudi women are leading the way in undermining their number one nemesis, male oppression.

Some of Saudi women’s remarkable accomplishments are noticeable and measurable in the media, limited businesses and academia, but above all in female-run learning institutions throughout the country. Known for its progressive residents’ laissez-faire attitude, Jeddah is the home of Dar Al-Hekma (house of Wisdom) women’s college. Founded in 1999, Dar Al-Hekma is graduating some of the best and brightest students anywhere in the world. Dar Al-Hekma is successful under the enlightened leadership of its dean, the sophisticated, highly educated and women’s rights advocate Dr. Suhair Hassan Al-Quraishi, and tireless instructors like Reem Asaad, the internationally known leader of the lingerie movement (dubbed the Bra Revolution in Saudi Arabia by a Swedish paper).

Despite its short history, small size and very modest budget, Dar Al-Hekma has graduated close to one thousand highly trained Saudi women who pursue careers in a country where there is still official gender segregation in the workplace and where a highly educated woman must provide a male relative’s approval before she can be considered for employment.,. Both the students and faculty of Dar Al-Hekma strive to excel, be financially independent and propel their country into a bright, tolerant, safe and prosperous future. These women deserve the support of the Saudi government, media, wealthy and enlightened Saudis and the international community, especially the U.S, Saudi Arabia’s reliable ally.

If replicated throughout Saudi Arabia without intervention from any government ministry or agency, especially the religious establishment, the Dar Al-Hekma model could change the educational landscape of Saudi Arabia. Dr. Al-Quraishi and her colleagues have proven their first-class capabilities and have had the experience to excel. They should be entrusted with creating five new campuses in Riyadh, Qatif, Braidah, Abha, and Ha’il. The Saudi private sector and government can spare $ 1 billion for the expansion of this national treasure.

Empowering Saudi women is in the best interest of all Saudis, rulers and ruled. Because of its centrality to Islam and its possession of large quantities of oil reserves, Saudi Arabia’s stability and security matter to the international community. There is no better way to achieve stability, prosperity and security than to support Saudi women in their quest to obtain their full rights and their place in Saudi society, the Muslim and Arab Worlds and the international community.

Read Article


Sell Them to the Highest Bidder

Director’s Comment: Saudi advocacy groups are using modern technology to promote Stone Age habits. They are encouraging wealthy Saudi men to do what has been practiced in Islam’s birthplace for centuries: own four women because it is legal to do so. In the past, this repulsive form of human trafficking was encouraged by men to prevent women from indulging in sexual activities after losing their husbands in the perpetual tribal wars that ravaged the region. Men justified the four wives’ system by saying that it kept women pure and their male relatives’ honor unblemished, but the real purpose of the system was to deny women their natural right to decide for themselves and determine their own destiny.

The new advocates are using the new social media (never mind that they consider its inventors to be infidels) to promote the sale of women to wealthy men. They have introduced Facebook campaigns supporting the four wives system and therefore are reaching much of the young Saudi population. The men advocate that “every Saudi and Arab man who is financially and physically able to marry more than one wife should not hesitate to do so in order to end spinsterhood among our women and help cap the high marriage costs that have deterred many young men from getting married.” The real goals behind the four wives system and its equally destructive cousin, the institutionalized male guardianship system, are to marginalize women and to prevent social cohesiveness, unity and collective productivity. The Saudi government uses the Machiavellian form of rule—divide and conquer.

The price that Saudi society, the Arab and Muslim Worlds and the international community are paying to deny Saudi women their basic human rights is dismally high. Saudi women are still prevented from participating in the decision-making process, especially in the areas of education and religion. Because of Saudi Arabia’s centrality to Islam, empowering Saudi women can resonate throughout the Muslim world and can eventually undermine the domestically, regionally and globally known Saudi mortal doctrine (known as Wahhabism) that promotes religious totalitarianism worldwide.
Read Article


Saudi Women are Exemplary

Director’s Comment: The attached article (Arabic text) diagnoses different aspects of Saudi society, especially as they relate to Saudi women. It details the multitude of counterproductive measures that Saudi institutions and society put in place to deny Saudi women the right to use their talents and contribute to the well-being of their country. In spite of formidable obstacles, many Saudi women are fighting for their rights and have shown that they can succeed when and wherever they are permitted to put their abilities to work.

For example, Saudi women are prevented from driving in Saudi Arabia, but can drive when outside of the country including in Arab Gulf states, most of which lie across the Saudi borders and share the same culture, history, tradition and religion with their bigger brothers, the Saudis. At a recent press conference in Dubai, the UAE’s chief of police reported that Saudi women are the best, safest and most polite drivers in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Traffic citations in the UAE are recorded according to violators’ ethnicities and nationalities.

If Saudi women are some of the best drivers outside of their country, why are they considered unfit to drive at home? The overt and nonsensical excuse is that women are emotional, incompetent and seductive; consequently, they would cause death and destruction in Saudi roads. In reality, the unspoken reasons are much deeper. They are political, economic and social. The Saudi ruling elites’ major fear of women driving and becoming mobile and financially independent emanates from the regime’s insecurity. The royals see self-reliant, educated, independent and free thinking Saudi women, and men for that matter, as the biggest threat to their domination over the county’s power and wealth.

Just imagine the effects on society if women were recognized as full citizens (human beings) by the system. Their enfranchisement will require millions of new jobs, improvement in the dilapidated and deficient infrastructure and bureaucracies and a competitive society. This means more money has to be spent on new projects, schools, services and modernization of institutions. Where would the money come from to meet these new public demands and needs? It would come from the treasury and here is where things can get complicated. As of now, most of the national income is controlled by the ruling family and a large portion of it goes to the royals’ bank account and the rest gets distributed to domestic loyal servants and foreign aids and investments.

By attending to the needs of half of its ignored population, women, the Saudi government would be forced to be at least partially accountable and transparent as well as subject to more public questioning of where and how the public wealth is spent.
Read Article (Arabic)


Join us:

The Center for Democracy & Human Rights in Saudi Arabia (CDHR) is a non-profit 501(c) (3) organization based in Washington, DC. CDHR provides new and accurate information for the benefit of the public, the business community and policy makers about the current situation in Saudi Arabia. CDHR’s goal is to help bring about a peaceful democratic transition from a single-family autocratic rule to a participatory political system where the rights of all Saudi citizens are protected under the rule of civil laws.

The Center could not undertake this important task without the active support of visionary individuals and foundations. CDHR needs the support of people who understand the importance of building a united, prosperous and tolerant society in Saudi Arabia where people are empowered to determine their destiny and the fate of their important, but unstable country. Please visit our website (www.cdhr.info) to learn about our work and see what you might do to support the many Saudi men and women who risk their livelihood and lives to promote a just political system that rejects all forms of incitement, religious hatred and oppression at home and abroad.

Your financial investment in democracy building in Saudi Arabia will benefit the Saudi people, the Middle East, the Muslim world, and the international community. Your contribution will make a difference and is greatly appreciated.

Please do not hesitate to contact us with any questions you may have about our mission and what you can do to promote a non-sectarian, accountable and transparent political system in Saudi Arabia where all citizens are treated equally under the rule of civil laws.

Contact us:

Center for Democracy & Human Rights in Saudi Arabia
1050 17th Street NW, Suite 1000
Washington, DC 20036

Phone: (202) 558-5552, (202) 413-0084

Fax: (202) 536-5210

Email: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

 

 

CDHR Conference on July 20, 2010

E-mail Print PDF

Based on a declaration made by a constellation of Muslim scholars, mostly from Al-Azhar, Islam’s oldest intellectual center, the Center for Democracy and Human Rights in Saudi Arabia (CDHR) hosted a conference titled "Echoing Muslim Scholars' Warning against Wahhabism: Should the U.S. Listen?" The well attended conference was held on Capitol Hill on July 20, 2010.

As an educational and democracy promoting organization, CDHR deemed it necessary to echo the voices of prominent Muslim scholars’ warnings against radical Islam, specifically the notorious Saudi government’s doctrine of Wahhabism. The goal of the conference on July 20 was to reiterate CDHR’s calls for the transformation of the Saudi religious and educational institutions that teach rejection of modernity, democratic reforms, and knowledge-based education. Wahhabism also indoctrinates the oppression of women and minorities and the condemnation of other religions, as stated by the participants in the Al-Azhar conference: "Wahhabism is a Mortal Enemy of and Threat to Islam and the World."

 

Dr. Alyami speaking at CDHR Conference July 20

E-mail Print PDF

alispeaking

Dr. Ali Alyami, Founder and Executive Director of CDHR, hosted the event and addressed the impact of Saudi Arabia’s religiously based policies on human development. He said the state doctrine is designed to deny people the opportunities to challenge themselves and explore their full potentials. He argued that people can only develop if social, scientific, political, and economic activities and challenges are not only prevalent, but encouraged and demanded by society. This translates to freedom of speech and expression, gender mingling, scientifically-based education, and competitiveness in all fields.

Based on its close alliance with and support for the Saudi ruling family, the West, especially the U.S., is in a position to peacefully influence events in Saudi Arabia. Dr. Alyami encouraged the West to understand the nature of the Saudi system and its reliance on religious extremism and its byproduct, terrorism, as declared by the Al-Azhar conference participants. Alyami called on the U.S. to publicly and unabashedly support Saudi men and women who push for democratic reforms because they are the key to stabilizing the country and undermining religious extremists who are bent on oppressing their people and spreading their lethal ideology.

Last Updated on Friday, 30 July 2010 17:23
 
  • «
  •  Start 
  •  Prev 
  •  1 
  •  2 
  •  3 
  •  Next 
  •  End 
  • »


Page 1 of 3

Donate to CDHR

Subscribe to Newsletter